BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> ANDURAGUARD (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2007] UKIntelP o24807 (28 August 2007) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o24807.html Cite as: [2007] UKIntelP o24807 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
For the whole decision click here: o24807
Result
Section 5(2)(b): Opposition successful.
Points Of Interest
Summary
The opponent in these proceedings owns a registration for the mark DURAGARD HY-BUILD in Class 2 in respect of identical and similar goods as those of the applicant.
Under Section 5(2)(b) the Hearing Officer noted that identical and similar goods were at issue and went on to compare the respective marks. In relation to the opponent’s mark the Hearing Officer decided that the DURAGUARD element was more distinctive than the element TY-BUILD which appeared to have descriptive connotations in respect of the goods at issue. The Hearing Officer also decided that DURAGUARD would be recognised as an element within the applicant’s mark ANDURGUARD. Looked at overall the Hearing Officer concluded that the respective marks were similar to the extent that even if not confused directly, consumers could well assume that the respective goods came from economically linked undertakings. Opposition thus successful under Section 5(2)(b).
