BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> FIANNA FAIL FINE GAEL (two applications) (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2008] UKIntelP o04308 (15 February 2008)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2008/o04308.html
Cite as: [2008] UKIntelP o04308, [2008] UKIntelP o4308

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


FIANNA FAIL FINE GAEL (two applications) (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2008] UKIntelP o04308 (15 February 2008)

For the whole decision click here: o04308

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/043/08
Decision date
15 February 2008
Hearing officer
Mr Geoffrey Hobbs QC
Mark
FIANNA FAIL FINE GAEL (two applications)
Classes
31, 35, 41
Applicants/Respondent
Patrick Melly (now using the name Patrick Gainsford O’Malley)
Opponents/Appellants
Fine Gael & Fianna Fail
Opposition
Appeal against the decision of the Registrar’s Hearing Officer in opposition proceedings

Result

Appeals successful (under Section 3(6))

Points Of Interest

Summary

At first instance (see BL O/212/07 & BL O/213/07) the Hearing Officer had dismissed the opposition under each of the grounds on which it had been brought. The opponents appealed to the Appointed person.

Following a detailed appraisal of the Hearing Officer’s decisions under Sections 3(3)(b) and 5(4)(a) (also Section 56) the Appointed Person upheld them and dismissed the appeals under those Sections. However, under Section 3(6), which could be raised on both absolute and relative grounds, the Appointed Person concluded that the Hearing Officer decision owed more to consideration of the ‘relative’ position than it did to a consideration of the ‘absolute’ position. The Appointed Person’s consideration of this latter aspect led him to find that the applications had indeed been made in bad faith. The appeals succeeded accordingly.

The Hearing Officer’s decision and costs orders were therefore set aside. The appellants requested awards of full costs in relation both to the opposition proceedings and the subsequent appeals. After due consideration, however, the Appointed Person made awards above the published scale but below the full costs registered.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2008/o04308.html