BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Lexis Nexis Risk Solutions FL Inc (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o14312 (30 March 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o14312.html
Cite as: [2012] UKIntelP o14312

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Lexis Nexis Risk Solutions FL Inc (Patent) [2012] UKIntelP o14312 (30 March 2012)

Patent decision

BL number
O/143/12
Concerning rights in
GB1019835.6
Hearing Officer
Miss J Pullen
Decision date
30 March 2012
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Lexis Nexis Risk Solutions FL Inc
Provisions discussed
PA 1977 Section 1(2)
Keywords
Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The invention relates to systems and methods for improved database queries where records may be incomplete and/or confidential and/or duplicated, to combine records in a way such that when a search query is executed multiple possible matches are returned. Each match is assigned a confidence score, and a test of the ratio between a highly ranked result and the next result, or sum of the other results in formed, and if the confidence score exceeds a threshold the result is output. The output identifies the records in a ‘foreign’ database which should be retrieved.

The Hearing Officer considered the four-step test in Aerotel/Macrossan in the light of the Symbian judgment, and found the contribution to relate to methods and systems for making database queries with returned values having a high confidence level. The Hearing Officer found the contribution to relate to a computer program as such and could find no technical contribution and so refused the applications under Section 18(3).


A HTML version of this file is not available see below or click here to view the pdf version : o14312


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2012/o14312.html