BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Wei Xu (Patent) [2022] UKIntelP o59322 (19 July 2022)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2022/o59322.html
Cite as: [2022] UKIntelP o59322

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Patent decision

BL number
O/593/22
Concerning rights in
GB 2108140.1 & GB2108142.7
Hearing Officer
Miss J Pullen
Decision date
12 July 2022
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Wei Xu
Provisions discussed
s.1(2), s.14(5), s.76
Keywords
Added subject matter, Clarity, Excluded fields (refused)
Related Decisions
None

Summary

The two inventions each relate to barcode-based transaction systems. The -˜140.1 invention relates to a barcode-based transaction system where a transaction-specific barcode is displayed on a checkout and captured by a user-™s mobile device. The mobile device communicates with a server to confirm that the barcode was generated according to a pre-set rule. Settlement can then be made from information encoded within the barcode. The -˜142.7 invention relates to a barcode-based arrangement of rewarding a commodity recommender when a user purchases a commodity. The arrangement uses mobile devices and various servers to implement a virtual currency rebate to the recommender.

The hearing officer found that the objection regarding -˜140.1 containing added matter was not correct and that an objection to -˜142.7 being unclear with regard to the definition of two servers was incorrect.

The hearing officer rejected the applicant-™s submissions that both inventions comprised a new arrangement of hardware or provided any actual contribution to the security of the transaction systems given the prior disclosure in the applicant-™s own previous patent application. The hearing officer found that the contributions of the inventions did not make a technical contribution and are excluded from patentability as a computer program and/or a business method, as such. The applications were refused under section 18(3).

Full decisionO/593/22 PDF document 359Kb


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2022/o59322.html