W under the Forfeiture Act 1982, Re (pensions) [2020] UKUT 155 (AAC) (9 May 2020)

BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> W under the Forfeiture Act 1982, Re (pensions) [2020] UKUT 155 (AAC) (9 May 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/155.html
Cite as: [2021] MHLR 129, [2020] UKUT 155 (AAC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

On a reference in respect of W under the Forfeiture Act 1982 [2020] UKUT 155 (AAC) (9 May 2020)

The forfeiture rule does not preclude Mr W from receiving the whole or part of the additional pension referable to his late wife.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 155 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/155.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> W under the Forfeiture Act 1982, Re (pensions) [2020] UKUT 155 (AAC) (9 May 2020) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/155.html Cite as: [2021] MHLR 129, [2020] UKUT 155 (AAC)