BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> Information Commissioner v Driver and Thanet District Council (Information rights - Freedom of information - absolute exemptions) [2020] UKUT 333 (AAC) (26 November 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/333.html
Cite as: [2020] UKUT 333 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]



Information Commissioner v Driver and Thanet District Council [2020] UKUT 333 (AAC) (26 November 2020)


nformation rights - Freedom of Information Act request for names of 5 exporters of live animals from Ramsgate which reached out of court settlements with Thanet District Council on their compensation claims following High Court decision in Barco de Vapor v Thanet District Council [2014] EWHC 490 - Information Commissioner's appeal to Upper Tribunal on 3 grounds - (1) whether exporters' names were information "obtained by" public authority within section 41(1)(a) FOIA (confidential information) - Browning v IC and DBIS [2014] EWCA 1050 applied - (2) whether parties' names a mutually agreed term of settlement agreements - (3) whether First-Tier Tribunal erred in refusing late application by public authority to rely on additional exemptions.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2020] UKUT 333 (AAC)


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2020/333.html