RA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (II) (Tribunal procedure and practice - tribunal jurisdiction) [2021] UKUT 148 (AAC) (16 June 2021)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> RA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (II) (Tribunal procedure and practice - tribunal jurisdiction) [2021] UKUT 148 (AAC) (16 June 2021)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/148.html
Cite as: [2021] UKUT 148 (AAC)

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

RA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (II) [2021] UKUT 148 (AAC) (16 June 2021)

In determining whether to proceed under rule 27(1), it is not merely enough to consider whether there is sufficient evidence to make a decision. The tribunal must also consider more generally whether it is in the interests of justice to proceed with a paper determination.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2021] UKUT 148 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/148.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> RA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (II) (Tribunal procedure and practice - tribunal jurisdiction) [2021] UKUT 148 (AAC) (16 June 2021) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2021/148.html Cite as: [2021] UKUT 148 (AAC)