MB v South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (Mental Health) [2023] UKUT 261 (AAC) (10 May 2023)

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> MB v South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (Mental Health) [2023] UKUT 261 (AAC) (10 May 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2023/261.html
Cite as: [2023] UKUT 261 (AAC)

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

This appeal is about whether the First-tier Tribunal's refusal of the patient's application to reinstate his application for review of his section involved an error of law. In particular, it is about whether the First-tier Tribunal was wrong not to consider whether the accumulation of evidence resulting from MB having had a further period of testing with greater freedoms amounted to a "relevant change in circumstances" capable of justifying reinstatement.

A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2023] UKUT 261 (AAC)

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2023/261.html

	[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
	Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) >> MB v South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (Mental Health) [2023] UKUT 261 (AAC) (10 May 2023) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKUT/AAC/2023/261.html Cite as: [2023] UKUT 261 (AAC)