BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Burgess Ltd v Customs & Excise [2003] UKVAT V18286 (13 August 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2003/V18286.html
Cite as: [2003] UKVAT V18286

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


    Burgess Ltd v Customs & Excise [2003] UKVAT V18286 (13 August 2003)

    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/03/319
    ROGER BURGESS LTD Appellant
    - and -
    THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS & EXCISE Respondents
    Tribunal Chairman: R L Barlow
    Sitting in public at Manchester on the 11 August 2003
    DIRECTION
    under Rule 30(8)
    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 13 December 2003 in the sum of £3112.48 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
    And upon hearing Mr R Burgess for the Appellant and Mr B Haley of the Solicitor's office of HM Customs and Excise for the Respondents and upon Mr Haley indicating that the amount in default should be reduced to £1556.24
    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
    And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
    This tribunal finds that the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal as reduced
    And this tribunal directs that this appeal dismissed and that there is to be no direction as to costs
    R L Barlow
    Chairman
    Released:
    ©CROWN COPYRIGHT 2003


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2003/V18286.html