BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Bowes v Customs & Excise [2003] UKVAT V18335 (30 September 2003)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2003/V18335.html
Cite as: [2003] UKVAT V18335

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


    Bowes v Customs & Excise [2003] UKVAT V18335 (30 September 2003)

    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/03/450
    KEVIN JAMES BOWES Appellant
    - and -
    THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS & EXCISE Respondents
    Tribunal Chairman: David Demack
    Sitting in public at Manchester on the 18 May 2003
    DIRECTION
    under Rule 30(8)
    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to the surcharge assessments listed in the Schedule hereto and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
    And upon hearing Mr H Bowes for the Appellant and Mr C Owen of the Solicitor's office of HM Customs and Excise for the Respondents
    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
    And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
    This tribunal finds that the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for any of the defaults which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal
    And this tribunal directs that this appeal is dismissed and that there is to be no direction as to costs
    THE SCHEDULE
    Default NoPeriod     Surcharge Assessment     PercentageAmount
    1.2/0125.4.0110245.98
    2.5/0127.2.0315598.05
    3.8/0127.2.0315708.90
    4.11/0127.2.0315834.15
    5.2/0227.2.03151281.30
    6.5/02116.6.0315154.55
    7.8/0211.10.0215728.61
    8.11/0212.2.0315256.27
    David Demack
    Chairman
    Released:
    ©CROWN COPYRIGHT 2003


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2003/V18335.html