Lionel Jacobs Ltd v Customs & Excise [2004] UKVAT V18558 (24 March 2004)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Lionel Jacobs Ltd v Customs & Excise [2004] UKVAT V18558 (24 March 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18558.html
Cite as: [2004] UKVAT V18558

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Lionel Jacobs Ltd v Customs & Excise [2004] UKVAT V18558 (24 March 2004)

     
    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2004/0050

    Copy sent to :

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

      LIONEL JACOBS LIMITED
    Appellant
      and  
         
      THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents
         
    Tribunal : RODNEY P HUGGINS (Chairman)
    MICHAEL M SILBERT FRICS

    Sitting in public in London on 24 March 2004

    DIRECTION
    Under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against decisions of the Respondents with respect to Default Surcharges being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined in Rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day.

    AND UPON HEARING Mr L L Jacobs, Director, for the Appellant and Mr Philip Webb, Advocate for the Respondents.

    AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules.

    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT the serious illness of Mr L L Jacobs and his inability to deal with his business affairs adequately during the VAT period ending 30 September 2002 provide him with a reasonable excuse for that period and after that date he should have made arrangements for either a member of his staff or his professional accountants to take over his VAT responsibility and he did not have a reasonable excuse for the other three period defaults.

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is allowed in part [in respect of period 09/02 only]

    And that there is to be no direction as to costs.

    Rodney P Huggins
    Chairman
    Release date :
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2004


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18558.html