MG Heating (IW) Ltd v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18582 (23 April 2004)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> MG Heating (IW) Ltd v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18582 (23 April 2004)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18582.html
Cite as: [2004] UKVAT V18582

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


MG Heating (IW) Ltd v Customs and Excise [2004] UKVAT V18582 (23 April 2004)

     

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/03/978

    Copy sent to:

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

    MG HEATING (IW) LIMITED Appellant

    - and -

    THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents

    Tribunal: JOHN F AVERY JONES CBE (Chairman)

    RICHARD CORKE FCA

    Sitting in public in Cardiff on 2 April 2004

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING Mrs P Crinnion for the Respondents, the Appellant not being represented

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal under Rule 26(2) and having announced its decision

    AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representative(s) stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT the return for the period 05/01 was posted on 3 May 2001. the only excuse put forward was that an office junior must have dated and posted the return late which is not capable of constituting a reasonable excuse in view of section 71(1)(b) of the VAT Act 1994

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED

    AND that there is to be no direction as to costs

    John F Avery Jones

    Chairman

    Release Date:

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2004


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2004/V18582.html