BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Dragon Futures Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2005] UKVAT V18939 (14 February 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V18939.html
Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V18939

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Dragon Futures Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2005] UKVAT V18939 (14 February 2005)


     

    Dragon Futures Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2005] UKVAT V18939 (14 February 2005)

    18939
    VALUE ADDED TAX – input tax – "carousel fraud" – whether established on facts – decision without reasons by consent of parties
    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE
    DRAGON FUTURES LIMITED Appellant
    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
    Tribunal: Dr David Williams (Chairman)
    Mr J N Brown CBE
    Mr C R Shaw FCA

    Sitting in public in London on 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18 January 2005

    Penny Hamilton of counsel instructed by McGrigors for the Appellant

    Phillipa Whipple of counsel instructed by the Acting Solicitor to HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005

    DECISION

  1. This decision is made following the conclusion of the first part of the hearings in the conjoined appeals between the Appellant and the Commissioners (the ongoing appeals). It is made immediately following the conclusion of the hearings, and without reasons, by consent of both parties under rule 17 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986.
  2. The decision of the Tribunal is that it is satisfied that the transaction identified to it by both parties as deal 514(a), 514(b) and 527(a) do not on their facts constitute a transaction where:
  3. (a) there were a missing and/or defaulting trader and/or hijacked VAT number, and
    (b) a chain of transactions in goods that was circular in nature, and
    (c) the chain was carried out in furtherance of an activity that was not an economic activity.

  4. Accordingly, to that extent only, the appeals of the Appellant succeed.
  5. The costs of this aspect of the appeals are to be determined at the same time as the costs of the ongoing appeals.
  6. DAVID WILLIAMS
    CHAIRMAN
    RELEASED: 14 February 2005

    LON/2004/1461

    LON/2004/1462

    LON/2004/1826

    LON/2004/1854

    LON/2004/1880


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V18939.html