BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Watts & Anor (t/a MLS Security Systems) v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT V19072 (29 April 2005) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19072.html Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19072 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
Watts & Anor (t/a MLS Security Systems) v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT V19072 (29 April 2005)
19072
LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/04/76
Copy sent to:
Appellant/Applicant
Respondents
TERENCE AND GARY WATTS T/A MLS SECURITY SYSTEMS Appellant
- and -
THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents
Tribunal: JOHN F AVERY JONES CBE (Chairman)
MRS C S DE ALBUQUERQUE
Sitting in public in London on 13 April 2005
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
AND UPON HEARING Mr T Watts for the Appellant and Mr J Holl for the Respondent
AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal under Rule 26(2) and having announced its decision
AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representative(s) stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules
THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT the appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for the late payment of the tax due for the period 06/02
The Tribunal expresses the hope that the Respondent will give the Appellant time to pay the surcharge.
AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED
AND that there is to be no direction as to costs
John F Avery Jones
Chairman
Release Date: 29 April 2005
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005