BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Beech’s Fine Chocolates Ltd v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT V19099 (27 April 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19099.html
Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19099

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]



     

    Beech's Fine Chocolates Ltd v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT V19099 (27 April 2005)

    19099

    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/05/0041

    BEECH'S FINE CHOCOLATES LIMITED Appellant

    and

    THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents

    Tribunal Chairman: Jean Warburton

    Sitting in public in Manchester on the 21 April 2005

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 22 November 2004 in the sum of £6395.78 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    And upon hearing Mark Horner, Finance Manager for the Appellant and Richard Mansell of the Solicitor's office of HM Customs and Excise for the Respondents

    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    This tribunal finds that the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal

    And this tribunal directs that this appeal is dismissed

    And that there is to be no direction as to costs

    JEAN WARBURTON
    CHAIRMAN
    Release Date: 27 April 2005
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19099.html