BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Beech’s Fine Chocolates Ltd v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT V19099 (27 April 2005) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19099.html Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19099 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
Beech's Fine Chocolates Ltd v Customs and Excise [2005] UKVAT V19099 (27 April 2005)
19099
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/05/0041
BEECH'S FINE CHOCOLATES LIMITED Appellant
and
THE COMMISSIONERS OF CUSTOMS AND EXCISE Respondents
Tribunal Chairman: Jean Warburton
Sitting in public in Manchester on the 21 April 2005
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 22 November 2004 in the sum of £6395.78 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Mark Horner, Finance Manager for the Appellant and Richard Mansell of the Solicitor's office of HM Customs and Excise for the Respondents
And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
This tribunal finds that the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal
And this tribunal directs that this appeal is dismissed
And that there is to be no direction as to costs
JEAN WARBURTON
CHAIRMAN
Release Date: 27 April 2005
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005