V19115
BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Weltonhurst Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2005] UKVAT V19115 (6 June 2005) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19115.html Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19115 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
19115
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/05/0089
WELTONHURST LIMITED Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
Tribunal Chairman: Richard Barlow
Sitting in public in Manchester on the 24 May 2005
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 12 November 2004 in the sum of £2147.23 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Edward Gierat for the Appellant and Richard Mansell of the Acting Solicitor for HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents and upon Mr Mansell having conceded that HM Revenue and Customs now concede there was a reasonable excuse for the said default
And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision accordingly
And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
This tribunal finds that the Appellant does have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal
And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed
And that there is to be no direction as to costs
RICHARD BARLOW
CHAIRMAN
Release Date: 6 June 2005
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005