BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Bolton Wanderers Football & Athletic Club Co Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2005] UKVAT V19235 (7 September 2005) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19235.html Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19235 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
19235
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/05/0018
BOLTON WANDERERS FOOTBALL &
ATHLETIC CLUB COMPANY LTD Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
Tribunal Chairman: David Demack
Member: Peter Whitehead
Sitting in public in Manchester on the 2 September 2005
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 16 December 2004 in the sum of £113,116 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Jonathan Cannan of counsel for the Appellant and Richard Mansell of the office of the Acting Solicitor for HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents
And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
By consent this tribunal finds that the Appellant timeously made its return for period 06/04
And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed and that the Respondents do pay the Appellant's costs to be assessed by a chairman of the tribunal if not agreed
DAVID DEMACK
CHAIRMAN
Release Date: 7 September 2005
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005