BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Macklow Industrial Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2005] UKVAT V19279 (06 October 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19279.html
Cite as: [2005] UKVAT V19279

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Macklow Industrial Ltd v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2005] UKVAT V19279 (06 October 2005)

     
    19279

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2005/629

    Copy sent to:

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

    MACKLOW INDUSTRIAL LTD Appellant

    - and -

    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal: STEPHEN OLIVER QC (Chairman)

    R S JOHNSON

    Sitting in public in London on 28 September 2005

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING Peter Chilvers for the Appellant and Pauline Crinnion for the Respondents

    AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT the cash flow problems encountered by the Appellants in March 2005 are excluded from ranking as a reasonable excuse by Section 71(1)(a) of VAT Act 1994 and the "time to pay" agreement did not affect the position in law

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED

    AND that there is to be no direction as to costs

    STEPHEN OLIVER QC

    Chairman

    Release Date: 6 October 2005

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2005


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2005/V19279.html