BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> O’Connor v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19813 (17 October 2006) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19813.html Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19813 |
[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
19813
MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/06/026
DAVID O'CONNOR Appellant
and
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR
HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
Tribunal Chairman: DAVID DEMACK
Sitting in public in Manchester on the 12 October 2006
DIRECTION
under Rule 30(8)
This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to the three surcharge assessments listed in the Schedule hereto in the sums of £899.54, £1,025.42 and £580.21 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day
And upon hearing Mr K Shaw for the Appellant and Mr R Mansell of the Solicitor's office for HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents
And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision
And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules
This tribunal finds that the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for defaults 1 and 2 on the said schedule which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal
And in relation to those assessments this tribunal directs that this appeal is dismissed
And in relation to default 3 this tribunal finds that the Appellant shall have a reasonable excuse and his appeal shall be allowed if he shall by 30 November 2006 have produced to the tribunal a copy of the Death Certificate of Mr Goy, the Appellant's former accountant, showing that death occurred between 16 July 2004 and 1 January 2005
And that there is to be no direction as to costs
THE SCHEDULE
Default No. | . Period | Surcharge Assessment Issued | Rate % | Surcharge Amount £ |
5 | 10.03 | 24.12.03 | 15 | 899.54 |
6 | 01.04 | 12.03.04 | 15 | 1025.42 |
7 | 10.04 | 17.10.05 | 15 | 580.31 |
DAVID DEMACK
CHAIRMAN
Release Date: 17 October 2006
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006