BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Z-Tech Control System Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19879 (13 November 2006)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19879.html
Cite as: [2006] UKVAT V19879

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Z-Tech Control System Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2006] UKVAT V19879 (13 November 2006)

     

    19879

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/06/966

    Copy sent to:

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

    Z-TECH CONTROL SYSTEM LIMITED Appellant

    - and -

    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal: STEPHEN OLIVER QC (Chairman)

    MRS R S JOHNSON

    Sitting in public in London on 8 November 2006

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING M Swinhoe, Managing Director for the Appellant and Jonathan Holl for the Respondents

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT there was no reasonable excuse for the late payment

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED

    AND that there is to be no direction as to costs

    STEPHEN OLIVER QC

    Chairman

    Release Date: 13 November 2006

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2006


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2006/V19879.html