BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Nares International Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20018 (16 February 2007)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2007/V20018.html
Cite as: [2007] UKVAT V20018

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

Nares International Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20018 (16 February 2007)

     

    20018

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2006/1115

    Copy sent to:

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

    NARES INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Appellant

    - and -

    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal: RODNEY P HUGGINS (Chairman)

    Sitting in public in London on 14 February 2007

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge relating to the period 06/06 in the sum of £3285.30 being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING Mr John Holmes, Director for the Appellant and Pauline Crinnion, Advocate, for the Respondents

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    AND THE parties present at the hearing by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT the excuses of the Appellant that the Director was away at the end of the accounting period and the turnover doubled over a period of four months creating considerable extra paperwork were not reasonable

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED

    AND that there is to be no direction as to costs

    RODNEY P HUGGINS

    Chairman

    Release Date: 16 February 2007

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2007

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2007/V20018.html