BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> W S Nann Builders Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20306 (14 August 2007)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2007/V20306.html
Cite as: [2007] UKVAT V20306

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

W S Nann Builders Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20306 (14 August 2007)

     
    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE
    Reference No: MAN/07/0577
    W S NANN BUILDERS LIMITED Appellant
    and
    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR
    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents
    Tribunal : Michael Tildesley OBE (Chairman)
    Sitting in public in North Shields on the 7 August 2007
    DIRECTION
    under Rule 30(8)

    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated the 16 March 2007 in the sum of £842.77 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    And upon hearing Walter Nann director for the Appellant company and Bernard Hayley of the Solicitor's office for HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents

    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    And the Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    This tribunal finds that the Appellant does have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under the Appeal.

    And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed.

    And that there is to be no direction as to costs

    MICHAEL TILDESLEY
    CHAIRMAN
    Release Date:
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2007

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2007/V20306.html