BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> Bewley v Revenue & Customs [2008] UKVAT V20789 (01 September 2008)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2008/V20789.html
Cite as: [2008] UKVAT V20789

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


Charles Stewart Bewley v Revenue & Customs [2008] UKVAT V20789 (01 September 2008)

     
    20789

    MANCHESTER TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: MAN/2008/0325

    CHARLES STEWART BEWLEY Appellant

    and

    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR

    HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal Chairman: Judith Mitting

    Sitting in public in Manchester on the 4 August 2008

    DIRECTION

    under Rule 30(8)

    This appeal against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated 18 January 2008 in the sum of £1,049.75 being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    And upon hearing the Appellant in person and Mr. B Haley of the Solicitor's office of HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents

    And this tribunal having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    And the Respondents by their said representative stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    This tribunal finds that the Appellant does have a reasonable excuse for the default which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under appeal

    And this tribunal directs that this appeal is allowed and that there is to be no direction as to costs

    Judith Mitting
    CHAIRMAN
    Release Date: 1 September 2008
    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2008


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2008/V20789.html