BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Journals
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Journals >> Lorraine v Markel: unnecessarily raising the standard for admissibility of electronic evidence
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/DEESLR/4_1803.html
Cite as: Lorraine v Markel: unnecessarily raising the standard for admissibility of electronic evidence

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Lorraine v Markel: unnecessarily raising the standard for admissibility of electronic evidence

Brian W. Esler

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v4i0.1803

Abstract


Brian W. Esler discusses the implications of the lengthy opinion of United States Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm in relation to the authentication of electronic evidence.

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/DEESLR/4_1803.html