BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Journals
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Journals >> Toward a new jurisprudence of information retrieval: What constitutes a “reasonable” search for digital evidence when using keywords?
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/DEESLR/5_1851.html
Cite as: Toward a new jurisprudence of information retrieval: What constitutes a “reasonable” search for digital evidence when using keywords?

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

Toward a new jurisprudence of information retrieval: What constitutes a “reasonable” search for digital evidence when using keywords?

Jason R. Baron

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v5i0.1851

Abstract


Conference paper by Jason R. Baron, Director of Litigation at the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration, an Adjunct Professor, School of Information Studies, University of Maryland, and serves as Editor-in-Chief of The Sedona Conference® Best Practices Commentary on the Use of Search and Information Retrieval, and a founding coordinator of the TREC Legal Track.

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/DEESLR/5_1851.html