BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Industrial Tribunals Northern Ireland Decisions >> Barrow v Terry Coyle t/a Icon Restauran... (Unauthorised Deduction of Wages Other) [2021] NIIT 02103_20it (27 October 2021) URL: http://www.bailii.org/nie/cases/NIIT/2021/02103_20IT.html Cite as: [2021] NIIT 02103_20it, [2021] NIIT 2103_20it |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
THE INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNALS
CASE REF: 2103/20
CLAIMANT: Steven Barrow
RESPONDENT: Terry Coyle t/a Icon Restaurant & Winebar
JUDGMENT
The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of £328.50 as the agreed amount of unlawful deduction of wages.
The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant the sum of £1599.83 as the amount owed of unpaid holiday pay.
CONSTITUTION OF TRIBUNAL
Employment Judge: Employment Judge Browne
Members: Mrs D Adams
Mrs F Cummins
APPEARANCES:
The claimant attended in person and represented himself.
The respondent attended in person and represented himself.
1. The Tribunal orally delivered its decision and reasons at the hearing after considering the oral and written evidence.
2. The respondent accepted that he owed the claimant the agreed amount of £328.50. He therefore is ordered to pay the claimant that amount.
3. The Tribunal unanimously accepted the evidence of the claimant over that of the respondent as regards his claim for unpaid holiday pay. The claimant amended his calculation of the amount outstanding to £1,599.83. The respondent is therefore ordered to pay to the claimant that amount.
4. At the conclusion of the proceedings, the respondent asked if he could appeal the Tribunal’s decision. The Tribunal verbally confirmed that he could appeal the decision; it is the respondent’s responsibility to ensure that he complies with the appropriate procedure and timescale after this decision is issued.
5. This is a relevant decision for the purposes of the Industrial Tribunals (Interest) Order (Northern Ireland) 1990.
Employment Judge:
Date and place of hearing: 16 September 2021, Belfast.
This judgment was entered in the register and issued to the parties on:
