BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> The Commissary of Peebles v a Bailie of Regality. [1680] 3 Brn 361 (24 June 1680) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1680/Brn030361-0474.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR JOHN LAUDER OF FOUNTAINHALL
Subject_2 SUMMER SESSION.
Date: The Commissary of Peebles
v.
a Bailie of Regality
24 June 1680 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
There was a competition betwixt the Commissary of Peebles and a Bishop's Bailie of a Regality there, which of them was most competent judge to a slander of calling one a thief. Alleged for the Bailie of Regality,—That a regality had power of repledgiation from all other courts, whether in matters civil or criminal; and so the curia Christianitatis should not have meddled to judge here; especially he being a churchman's bailie, and so as capable to judge on scandal as the Official or Commissary. This went to the Lords' answer; but it was the general opinion, that the Commissary was more competent, especially being an ecclesiastic regality, who do not so properly repledge, but only sit and concur with the other judge.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting