![]() |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> AA027042015 [2017] UKAITUR AA027042015 (14 December 2017) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2017/AA027042015.html Cite as: [2017] UKAITUR AA027042015, [2017] UKAITUR AA27042015 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/02704/2015
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On 5 December 2017 |
On 14 December 2017 |
|
|
Before
THE HON. LADY RAE
(sitting as a Judge of the Upper Tribunal)
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JORDAN
Between
[I B]
Appellant
and
The Secretary Of State For The Home Department
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Ms E. Fitzsimons, Counsel instructed by Duncan Lewis Solicitors
For the Respondent: Mr S. Kotas, Home Office Presenting Officer
REASONS FOR FINDING AN ERROR OF LAW
1. Mr Kotas on behalf of the Secretary of State has conceded before us that the determination reveals a material error on a point of law in that the First-tier Tribunal Judge failed to have regard to the evidence of the appellant's witnesses and to the expert report of Mr Chacko.
2. We set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal and remit the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal for it to be re-made.
We direct
(i) The Secretary of State is to set out what parts of the appellant's account are conceded to be true or are the subject of sustainable findings of fact made by the First-tier Tribunal Judge that she does not challenge in the re-making of the decision.
(ii) If the concessions made in (i) above, arise from information provided to the Secretary of State, she is to provide a copy of the document containing the information or a redacted version of it or an extract of the relevant parts.
(iii) The requirement in (ii) above arises from the respondent's duty of disclosure and fairness, subject to all just reservations.
DECISION
The Judge made an error on a point of law and we set the determination aside.
The appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be re-made subject to the parties' agreement as to those matters which are not disputed.
ANDREW JORDAN
JUDGE OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
7 December 2017