BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> Gerkros Boilers (Tipperary) Limited v Alley Enterprises Ltd (Patent) [2005] UKIntelP o30405 (15 November 2005)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o30405.html
Cite as: [2005] UKIntelP o30405

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Gerkros Boilers (Tipperary) Limited v Alley Enterprises Ltd [2005] UKIntelP o30405 (15 November 2005)

For the whole decision click here: o30405

Patent decision

BL number
O/304/05
Concerning rights in
EP 0616676
Hearing Officer
Mr P Back
Decision date
15 November 2005
Person(s) or Company(s) involved
Gerkros Boilers (Tipperary) Limited v Alley Enterprises Ltd
Provisions discussed
CPR Rule 31 as modified by paragraph 5 of the Practice Direction to Rule 63
Keywords
Confidentiality, Disclosure, Evidence, Revocation
Related Decisions
None

Summary

Several preliminary issues had arisen between the parties before the application for revocation was heard. The issues included: the inspection of boilers in Ireland; Alleys request for disclosure of details of brand names/trade marks used on various boilers sold by Gerkros; whether disclosure by Gerkros should be limited to standard disclosure or additional disclosure as requested by Alley; whether Gerkros should release a service test engineer (Mr Bailey) and a boiling testing facility (CRE) from a confidentiality agreement; and an extension of time for submission of Alleys evidence. The Hearing Officer held that:

1. A joint inspection of the boilers to take place to an agreed timetable with an expert, one legal representative, and one patent agent from each party and a Gerkros engineer being present with Alley given time to inspect the boilers in private.

2. The disclosure of information to Alley on brand names/trade marks by Gerkros was not justified.

3. In addition to any standard disclosure agreed between the parties, Gerkros to give further disclosure in respect of certain items.

4. Gerkros to withdraw its objections to Mr Bailey and CRE discussing their dealings with Gerkros with Alley regarding the issues in this case.

5. An extension of time for Alley to file evidence was acceptable in accordance with the wishes of both parties.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2005/o30405.html