BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office Decisions >> IN THE PINK (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2007] UKIntelP o32007 (1 November 2007)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o32007.html
Cite as: [2007] UKIntelP o32007

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


IN THE PINK (Trade Mark: Opposition) [2007] UKIntelP o32007 (1 November 2007)

For the whole decision click here: o32007

Trade mark decision

BL Number
O/320/07
Decision date
1 November 2007
Hearing officer
Mr R Colombo
Mark
IN THE PINK
Classes
16
Applicant
Gerard Dugdill
Opponent
Xcess Media Limited
Opposition
1. Sections 3(6) & 5(4)(a) 2. Interlocutory hearing to consider request by opponent for an extension of time within which to file evidence in reply.

Result

Request by opponent for extension of time. Extension allowed.

Points Of Interest

Summary

Following the filing of opposition both parties requested, and were allowed, extensions of time before filing their evidence in chief. Subsequently the opponent was allowed a period of three months to 28 May 2007 to file its evidence in reply. At or about this date the opponent stated that it required a further three months to file its response because it had dispensed with its trade mark representatives and time was needed to obtain the relevant files and prepare the reply evidence. It pointed out that the applicant had filed lengthy and complex evidence.

The registry initially refused the request but on appeal allowed the extension of three months. The applicant objected to the grant and requested a hearing. The hearing took place on 12 September 2007 by which time the opponent had filed its evidence in reply.

After hearing the parties the Hearing Officer confirmed the Registrar’s view to grant the extension of time requested so that the evidence provided could be accepted into the proceedings. In his view the reasons for the request had been valid, the evidence had been filed and it was preferable that the current proceedings should proceed to a conclusion.



BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKIntelP/2007/o32007.html